Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by Doctor_Fegg on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @07:27AM
(#38262473)
PSA - the HN article submitter ("Tomte") is not Placemark's author (Tom MacWright) despite the three matching letters.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by michaelcampbell on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @07:54AM
(#38262707)
Tom M seems to not like HN, so this makes sense.
Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by 4ggr0 on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @09:57AM
(#38264004)
He does have an account here, tho, and is responding to comments.
Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by thewarpaint on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @11:27AM
(#38265462)
Either the snippet has a bug, or he changed his mind and removed it, but it’s not working.
Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by aseipp on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @12:14PM
(#38266211)
Hacker News puts `noreferrer` on the link (because apparently Internet Points and Arguments are more important than the courtesy of respecting the wishes of the author.)
Re:Placemark is going open source and shutting down
by Modified3019 on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @02:18PM
(#38268105)
>I’ve learned some bad habits from Hacker News. I added Caveats sections to articles to make sure that nobody would take my points too broadly. I edited away asides and comments that were fun but would make articles less focused. I came to expect pedantic, judgmental feedback on everything I wrote, regardless of what it was.
>Writing for the Hacker News audience makes my writing worse.
Yeah, understandable.