News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub... by littlecranky67 on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @03:47AM (#38260695)
Easily solveable by offering the same app for free with IAP (or as shareware), and the same app for a price as a one-time purchase.
Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub... by JosephRedfern on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @03:59AM (#38260773)
It feels like an IAP would be more fitting than an entirely separate app, though -- it'd be a shame to require a new listing just to work around this filtering.

Maybe static analysis could determine whether the IAP unlocked a new feature/functionality or not, feeling into the labelling/filtering?

Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub... by MrDresden on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @04:09AM (#38260848)
What does this solve?

The developer now has two apps on the play store, still with no paying customers for either of them. The aversion to paying for quality is still present.

Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub... by vetinari on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @04:53AM (#38261217)
Thanks to sandboxing, the paid version would not be able to access data created by the free version, when trialing.

To avoid this problem in the past, authors offered the free version, and then paid unlock as a separate app package. So you could continue to use the original application you trialed, and the unlock package would turn it into the full version.

Unfortunately, this stopped when in-app purchases appeared.