Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub...
by dmitrygr on Monday November 13, 2023 @10:06PM
(#38258525)
I cannot imagine any sane person coming up with this as a solution to any problem other than "it is too easy as an indie developer to make an app, solve a problem people have, and make it big in the world". Seriously whose ass did this idea get pulled from, and how can this be justified?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub...
by Rastonbury on Monday November 13, 2023 @10:35PM
(#38258762)
Yeah this is just going to spawn a cottage industry on Fiverr with jobs for "20 people testing your Android app", it honestly reminds me of my county's bureaucrats needlessly adding hoops to a process (which is so they can collect bribes).
Even for a small company of up to 10 people, I doubt many have 20 testing user lying around ready and waiting. Either pay/recruit or everyone get their extended families
Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub...
by gilgoomesh on Monday November 13, 2023 @10:33PM
(#38258744)
My guess is that 2 weeks and the usage pattern of 20 users gives Google enough data points to determine whether the app is just AI generated bot spam. Because I'm betting there's a lot of that at the moment.
Still seems like absurdly high bar for indie devs to clear.
Re:Android App Devs now require 20 people to test before pub...
by HurdsTimesNear on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @10:07AM
(#38264132)
Maybe that is the exact problem this is meant to solve. Maybe all these countless apps cost too much to host for google?