Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by Alifatisk on Monday November 13, 2023 @08:40AM
(#38249974)
Sounds like from the comments that Rails is gaining a little bit more popularity again instead of being known as the boring robust framework
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by lagniappe on Monday November 13, 2023 @09:36AM
(#38250548)
I probably won't use it again in any projects, but I liked the video because of nostalgia. Rails is a memory of a fun and scrappier me, a different time, appropriate in its own light for my path at the time.
Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by DoesntMatter22 on Monday November 13, 2023 @09:44AM
(#38250646)
After doing lots of Node and Go I've recently come back to Rails and, no joke, it's about 5x faster in development for me. So many niceties. Using Prisma I had a 25 line method (and no real models) and that went down to 3 lines in Rails. It's just a night and day difference. I won't leave Rails again.
Rails really is the premiere framework for web development speed
Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by Alifatisk on Monday November 13, 2023 @01:53PM
(#38253696)
I couldn't have said it better, its impressive how much you are able to do through Rails in such a short time.
Why wouldn't you use it again and what would you use instead?
Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by mplewis on Monday November 13, 2023 @10:51AM
(#38251567)
Governance seems more invested in making ideological changes (dropping Webpacker, TypeScript, breaking changes between versions that add busywork but no value) than building the community and expanding reach. DHH continues to push poor technical decisions and alienate contributors by taking weird political stands.
As someone who’s taken multiple projects to production in Rails and generally loves Ruby, these days I prefer to start new projects in full-stack TypeScript. RedwoodJS has been quite good.
Re:Ruby on Rails: The Documentary [video]
by whitepoplar on Monday November 13, 2023 @05:33PM
(#38256295)
Which of DHH's technical decisions would you consider poor?