News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jeff Geerling by emptysongglass on Sunday November 12, 2023 @05:14AM (#38238966)
I very much dislike folks who use their influence to spread this stuff. Precisely because the way social media works, it amplifies into a crescendo of shallow takes and worst emotion. People with influence have a responsibility not to abuse their position. Calling them out on it (the first I've ever done) is not a "crusade".
Re:Jeff Geerling by yipbub on Monday November 13, 2023 @06:24AM (#38249081)
You replied to many top level comments for a period of time the same period of time with almost the same text. Telling people to disregard this one persons tech content because of software-politics views. Does he not also have the right to call out IBM/Red Hat?
Re:Jeff Geerling by emptysongglass on Monday November 13, 2023 @04:38PM (#38255738)
> You replied to many top level comments for a period of time the same period of time with almost the same text.

I've reviewed my comments and this is mostly false. Not sure why you felt you needed to put this one in here.

> Does he not also have the right to call out IBM/Red Hat?

"Calling out" does not mean distorting facts to kickstart a rage-fuelled campaign against the company that offers, to this day, the most to the Linux ecosystem, free of charge, freely licensed.

To wit, he is an influencer, I am not, and should be much more careful with how he wields his influence. That was what I have re-iterated, comment by comment.

Re:Jeff Geerling by yipbub on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @03:26AM (#38274499)
> I've reviewed my comments and this is mostly false. Not sure why you felt you needed to put this one in here.

Huh, me too. Could've sworn I saw this, and now I don't. My bad...