Re:The First Commercial Carbon-Sucking Facility in the US Op...
by Dylan16807 on Sunday November 12, 2023 @02:06AM
(#38238048)
That's not what I'm talking about. Pretend getting to the moon would have cost a quadrillion dollars. We wouldn't have been able to do it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The First Commercial Carbon-Sucking Facility in the US Op...
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday November 12, 2023 @10:48AM
(#38241168)
> Pretend getting to the moon would have cost a quadrillion dollars. We wouldn't have been able to do it.
This is a statement of reality, not economic system. A society that decided to divert resources, today, to building a Dyson sphere on Alpha Centauri would fail, irrespective of economic system, because the goal demands more resources than it can sustainably divert.
Re:The First Commercial Carbon-Sucking Facility in the US Op...
by Dylan16807 on Sunday November 12, 2023 @03:34PM
(#38243839)
> This is a statement of reality, not economic system.
Yes, that's my point. The worry about "economically feasible" in the ancestor comment is a question of what plans are realistic with unlimited motivation. It's not about economic systems holding us back.