News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by josephcsible on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:12PM (#38222340)
The difference is that you own your car, but not those other things. Things you own should always do what you want, not try to enforce laws against you.
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by RC_ITR on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:15PM (#38222373)
I was under the impression that 99.9% of people take their cars out on publicly owned roads when they drive. Am I mistaken?
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by josephcsible on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:17PM (#38222403)
But this would go in the cars, not in the roads, so that's irrelevant.
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by TheCoelacanth on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:37PM (#38222683)
And the TSA rules apply to my suitcase, not to the plane. What's the difference?
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by josephcsible on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:47PM (#38222809)
Your suitcase isn't required to have a built-in X-ray machine.
Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by RC_ITR on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:19PM (#38222436)
Well it wouldn't preclude your use of the car (you can still enter it and turn it on), you just can't drive it on public roads (Essentially the entire use-case of moving a vehicle).

TSA is at the airport lobby and technically only precludes me from entering the airside of an airport, but its purpose is to prevent me from getting on a plane with a gun.

I don't think point of implementation is a strong argument here.

Re:Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driv... by hammock on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:29PM (#38222578)
Wouldn’t an closer equivalent be DUI checkpoints staffed by government-accountable law enforcement officers at the entrance to the road? Not an automaker forced to privately police you in your own vehicle