He calls out the lack of commodities as a problem to be addressed unlike flying which was a solved problem.

“everybody must live in fear of being eliminated from the economic cycle”

Thus emphasizing the critical nature of bakers.

> There is really only one way to read his message.

This thread is a clear indicator that ther are multiple ways to read it. One may seem more valid than others but it's not at all unambiguous.

I'd love to know what the people in 5000 years, if there are any, project onto this. Maybe they'll refer back to this thread and fall into two major camps.

No, what this thread shows is that however clear you express something, there will always be people refusing to understand it.

Irony levels of this thread are approaching 9000.