News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by patrakov on Friday November 10, 2023 @01:59AM (#38215956)
Do not firewall them off. Serve different content and break functionality in a self-explanatory way (i.e. an email that tells what's wrong).
Re: by martin_a on Friday November 10, 2023 @07:48AM (#38218184)
This is nothing user-facing. Microsoft will run that in the background, firewalling it off breaks it, so they'll have to act.
Re: by __david__ on Friday November 10, 2023 @10:46AM (#38220290)
The emails are user facing. So if, say, the ISP were to detect Microsoft servers connecting and serve them back a mailbox with a single email in it instead of the user's real mailbox, then the user would open Outlook and see just a single message. Ideally non-threateningly titled "MICROSOFT HAS STOLEN YOUR PASSWORD" and containing clear instructions on how to switch back to direct IMAP.
Re: by averageRoyalty on Friday November 10, 2023 @04:25PM (#38224748)
That's a great idea and would be extremely easy to roll out. I hope people start doing that!
Re: by fyokdrigd on Friday November 10, 2023 @04:27PM (#38224775)
i can't wait to have to answer an email-captch for every imap connection in the future, just because Microsoft decided to do an Apple.