News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear Energy Project in Idaho Is Canceled by bluefirebrand on Thursday November 09, 2023 @12:10PM (#38207712)
Wonder if it's worth digging into why that's the case. It seems like it's a lot more than just the cost of materials + labour that's the problem.
Re:Nuclear Energy Project in Idaho Is Canceled by panick21_ on Thursday November 09, 2023 @12:26PM (#38207960)
There is lots of research on that for transport infrastructure at least.

https://transitcosts.com/

https://pedestrianobservations.com/

Re:Nuclear Energy Project in Idaho Is Canceled by tomatocracy on Thursday November 09, 2023 @01:03PM (#38208436)
There's been some work done on this in the US context (eg [0]) but not really enough. It seems like general large project issues (need to adapt to site specific conditions as they are discovered, difficulty ensuring work stays properly scheduled so that construction workers don't sit idle for large amounts of time, etc.) are a big part, and these are made worse because of the knock on impact when these interact with safety regulations/processes.

There's some hope that making designs smaller and more modular might enable less chance of big overspend at a slightly higher expected cost but that's speculation until we actually do it.

0. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243512...

Re:Nuclear Energy Project in Idaho Is Canceled by renewiltord on Saturday November 11, 2023 @03:21AM (#38228483)
Ultimately, if you're forced to send cluster munitions because your ammo factory is a historically listed building that can't expand to fulfill demand, I think it won't matter how much you cut everything else. You just can't build another ammo factory, so you just don't get to do things.