About Pando

Posted by dwynings on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @12:46AM
from the uncrunched.com dept.

http://uncrunched.com/2012/04/09/about-pando/

( 5 comments | 17 points | on HN )

Re:About Pando by oldstrangers on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @01:15AM (#3820794)

It's nice to finally see companies tire of Arrington's shit. Out of two jobs in less than a year. Hope the trend continues.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About Pando by wattjustin on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @01:36AM (#3820858)

I hope so too. Maybe he'll stop posting "news" about himself and realize how uninteresting his drama is. And maybe at that point I'll stop leaving annoyed, uninteresting, and bitter comments about how annoyed I am of seeing his name pop up anywhere.

I think this will be a good test, so to speak, of Pando to see if they hop on the drama train like those at TC enjoy(ed) doing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About Pando by BerislavLopac on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:35AM (#3821018)

Yawn. These are not the tech news you are looking for. Move along. Move along.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About Pando by drivebyacct2 on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @01:03AM (#3820766)

Another source of drama, woohoo. Also, how much effort did they go to to make such a simple page so unresponsive. Still harkening back to TC I see. The page is nearly completely unresponsive for a good 6 seconds while who-knows-what loads in. What the hell?

According to Chrome's Inspector it took 20.60s to load entirely. (And after the wait, they're not even using the Twitter widget properly as it's giving a 4xx error)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About Pando by chubbyheckler on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @08:42AM (#3821866)

Go. Away. Arrington.

I am tired of your Paris Hilton shit - you provide no value to the tech community.

[ Parent | on HN ]