Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by khimaros on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @06:57PM
(#38199003)
last i checked, Telegram was not end-to-end encrypted by default. has this changed?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by om154 on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @07:28PM
(#38199275)
Telegram at least offers end-to-end encrypted “Secret Chats”
Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by Moldoteck on Thursday November 09, 2023 @02:15AM
(#38202066)
These are worse compared to signal chats. In signal, after login on say phone+ desktop, you'll have access to messages in secret chats on both devices(wish it would sync even if login on second device was later), on tg you are limited to only one
Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by jacooper on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @07:06PM
(#38199100)
Nope.
Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by tomtheelder on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @08:29PM
(#38199776)
HN doesn’t like hearing this, but e2e encryption is kind of an anti-feature for the vast majority of users. The usability tradeoff is real, and most folks don’t care at all about the privacy/security side.
Re:Signal Public Username Testing (Staging Environment)
by Moldoteck on Thursday November 09, 2023 @02:13AM
(#38202056)
Thing is, both can be achieved, but tg doesn't want to implement e2ee by default and signal doesn't want to implement a proper sync mechanism bc of some extra security(imo it's bs, extra security can be achieved with a proper implementation)