Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by embattled physicist

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by tedunangst on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @07:54PM (#38185361)

The duality of HN. I want other people to be forced to filter out bullshit, but I only want to receive forthright submissions myself.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by cobbal on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:08PM (#38185447)

It's really weird. I'm starting to suspect hacker news isn't a single person.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by Regnore on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:31PM (#38185617)

Then why is it called the singular “Hacker” news?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by golergka on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:40PM (#38185680)

Because there's only one intended reader who is sufficiently educated and smart. All others of us are impostors who should not have pursued this career at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by thomastjeffery on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:43PM (#38185697)

If only the Hackers Knew..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by weard_beard on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @10:28PM (#38186395)

No one ever asks Hacker Feels

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by bcrosby95 on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:23PM (#38185557)

Yes and no - everyone is just a figment of my imagination.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by sltkr on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @08:29PM (#38185599)

I'm pretty sure I'm you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by ... by dllthomas on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @09:39PM (#38186096)

Who am us, anyway?

[ Parent | on HN ]