News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:X Is Reportedly Selling Inactive Usernames for $50k by phailhaus on Sunday November 05, 2023 @09:51PM (#38158231)
Facts don't care about your feelings: Twitter admitted it was biased towards rightwing politicians and news outlets. [1] The idea that Twitter was "censoring conservatives" was always a lie, because they tended to break the rules more often.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-a...

Re:X Is Reportedly Selling Inactive Usernames for $50k by bufferoverflow on Sunday November 05, 2023 @10:15PM (#38158395)
> because they tended to break the rules more often.

No, this is a lie. The rules were applied in a very one-sided manner. A left-leaning poster would not even get a warning, while a right-leaning one would get insta-banned forever for the smallest infraction.

Re:X Is Reportedly Selling Inactive Usernames for $50k by Kye on Monday November 06, 2023 @06:07AM (#38161066)
That's weird because I watched as left-leaning accounts got banned one after the other over the years. Maybe you think it's biased a certain way because of who you follow and listen to.

I never thought I would recommend an episode of Joe Rogan, but the one where he had Vijaya Gadde on provided a lot of insight into how Twitter thought about moderation. It was a lot more nuanced than I expected.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZCBRHOg3PQ

Re:X Is Reportedly Selling Inactive Usernames for $50k by angoragoats on Monday November 06, 2023 @08:47AM (#38162502)
Please provide evidence to support your claims.
Re:X Is Reportedly Selling Inactive Usernames for $50k by lmm on Sunday November 05, 2023 @10:08PM (#38158344)
> Twitter admitted it was biased towards rightwing politicians and news outlets.

Twitter claimed it was biased towards rightwing politicians and news outlets, while refusing to release the data that it claimed would show this.

> The idea that Twitter was "censoring conservatives" was always a lie, because they tended to break the rules more often.

Were those rules neutral? Even more importantly, were the people determining whether those rules were broken or not?