We will give voice to David Barton's ideas, but if I said I wanted to "end" David Barton, I would be the bad guy in this conversation.
We already live in a theorcracy, and have lived in a theocracy since the so called election of George W Bush.
For millennials like myself who were not born into the families of rich elite or local party officials, we have been violently subjected to deprivation of rights, forced into precarity engineered before we were born into a world we did not consent to enter, subjected to an Eternal September 11th where our responses to trauma are forever policed and monetized if we do anything but simp for the money for bread and circuses.
(Not that the contemporary Catholic Church advocates or would do that. I’m asking a legal question.)
What is problematic in the US context is that the majority of the population doesn’t so neatly subscribe to a single faith, not even historically. The US has always been a mix of, first, the “mainline” Christian denominations, then since the early 19th century a mess of neo-Protestant sects, and finally every world religion. So, I think would have to underscore that it is this particular environment that trying to establish any religion as advantaged would require some authoritarian steps.
Although, if one had to pick, Evangelicals would clearly win, due to their existing political power.
Of course, Barton figures he'll be one of the rulers...