Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Gains Traction

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by dividendpayee on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:30PM (#38137192)

Besides the point, but why would you abbreviate "Downloadable" as "D/loadable"? The confusion vs. two extra letters trade-off doesn't seem worth it at all to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by defrost on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:55PM (#38137333)

People vary a great deal, for example the trade-off in making a lengthy comment from a meconium account doesn't seem worth it to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by godelski on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:18PM (#38137481)

I'm uncertain if this was a joke or not, but either way I laughed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by goldenkey on Saturday November 04, 2023 @12:11AM (#38138060)

Same and it only cost me time to laugh and comment. In those seconds, the wavefunction of the universe shifted to a hellscape. Use your time carefully /Fluke/Luke/s!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by permo-w on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:27PM (#38137544)

reminds of the plastic vs cotton bag carbon footprint debate

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uranium Demand Hits Decade High as Nuclear Renaissance Ga... by TaylorAlexander on Friday November 03, 2023 @11:50PM (#38137990)

It's particularly funny to me to save two characters while linking to a 568 page PDF.

[ Parent | on HN ]