News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by rekoil on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @06:51PM (#38106488)
Yes, they do, huge mistake

...but a lot of fun!

Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by lolsowrong on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:11PM (#38106704)
Explain why it’s a huge mistake, please.
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by wholinator2 on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:23PM (#38106801)
I think the idea is ambiguity between a zip file from your coworkers website and an entirely separate phishing website which downloads an entirely different zip file with a malicious payload.

Anything that introduces unnecessary and previously unforseen ambiguity to the olds is just another path to filling the internet with scams

Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by Clamchop on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:33PM (#38106907)
Browser vendors should just splash users with one of those click-through security warnings. Make it bright yellow.

I'd be very entertained by drama from owners of those domains, but in my opinion, such a thing would be completely justified.

Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by afavour on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @08:02PM (#38107141)
Here’s the problem: the biggest browser vendor is the one selling the domains!
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by eru on Thursday November 02, 2023 @12:58AM (#38109182)
Well, we also have .com as a common extension on Windows machines?
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by snypher on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @09:35PM (#38107857)
A link reading attachment.zip is no longer a 'safe' file but a eg browser window.
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain by mholt on Thursday November 02, 2023 @01:31AM (#38109359)
Check out familyphotos.zip