Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain
by lolsowrong on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:11PM
(#38106704)
Explain why it’s a huge mistake, please.
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain
by wholinator2 on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:23PM
(#38106801)
I think the idea is ambiguity between a zip file from your coworkers website and an entirely separate phishing website which downloads an entirely different zip file with a malicious payload.
Anything that introduces unnecessary and previously unforseen ambiguity to the olds is just another path to filling the internet with scams
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain
by Clamchop on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @07:33PM
(#38106907)
Browser vendors should just splash users with one of those click-through security warnings. Make it bright yellow.
I'd be very entertained by drama from owners of those domains, but in my opinion, such a thing would be completely justified.
Re:Introduc ing the .ing top-level domain
by afavour on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @08:02PM
(#38107141)
Here’s the problem: the biggest browser vendor is the one selling the domains!
Well, we also have .com as a common extension on Windows machines?
...but a lot of fun!