People with autism less likely to succumb to bystander effect, research finds

Re:People with autism less likely to succumb to bystander ef... by vasco on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @01:57AM (#38080820)

And what I was sharing is that someone like me wouldn't consider that outcome as "works". Someone that follows the herd in this scenario is exactly the type of person that would say "what do you mean, it worked anyway?".

In my mind if I'm an adult person in an airport and I missed obvious signs and just went with everyone I'd be genuinely thinking about this for days and softly beat myself up, look up the airport floorplan and for years after in every airport I would think about this.

This is not a hypothetical for me because it has happened and I'm still triggered about it to the point that's years later and I'm here typing about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:People with autism less likely to succumb to bystander ef... by licebmi__at__ on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @05:51AM (#38082344)

So you’ve never encountered a situation where going against the grain, even if for completely good reasons, fails? I know I’ve been in that place more than once.

GP was only saying that going with the herd is most of the time a more successful strategy, and even if I don’t follow it, I’m not blind to my selection bias to say it doesn’t. As he stated, it wouldn’t have been selected otherwise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:People with autism less likely to succumb to bystander ef... by wkat4242 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @07:36AM (#38083211)

> So you’ve never encountered a situation where going against the grain, even if for completely good reasons, fails? I know I’ve been in that place more than once.

I'd rather be wrong on my own decision than on one I blindly followed from someone else :)

And it's not about going against the grain. It's about making conscious decisions rather than blind following. The outcome can very well be the same as everyone else's of course.

[ Parent | on HN ]