Re:Google Brain cofounder says Big Tech lying about risks of...
by mvdtnz on Monday October 30, 2023 @03:58PM
(#38074865)
Literally the thing people are calling "AI" is a program that, given some words, predicts the next word. I refuse to entertain the absolutely absurd idea that we're approaching a general intelligence. It's ludicrous beyond belief.
Re:Google Brain cofounder says Big Tech lying about risks of...
by pixl97 on Monday October 30, 2023 @04:26PM
(#38075286)
Then this is your failure, not mine, and not a failure of current technology.
I can, right now, upload an image to an AI and say "Hey, what do you think the emotional state of the person in this image is" pretty damned accurately. Given other images I can have the AI describe the scene and make pretty damned accurate assessments of how the image could have came about.
If this is not general intelligence I simply have no guess as to what will be enough in your case.
Re:Google Brain cofounder says Big Tech lying about risks of...
by SpicyLemonZest on Monday October 30, 2023 @04:11PM
(#38075065)
Modern generative AI functionality is hardly limited to predicting words. Have you not heard of e.g. Midjourney?
Re:Google Brain cofounder says Big Tech lying about risks of...
by concordDance on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @04:23AM
(#38081646)
By "approaching" do you mean "likely to achieve it this century"?
Why the shit would we not draw a straight line?
If we fail to create digital intelligence then yea, we can hem and haw in conversations like this forever online, but you tend to neglect that if we succeed then 'shit gets real quick'. Closing your eyes and years and saying "This can't actually happen" sounds like a pretty damned dumb take on future risk assessments of technology when pretty much most takes on AI say "well, yea this is something that could potentially happen".