News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gnome Shell and Unity by buster on Friday April 06, 2012 @05:13AM (#3806470)
I can understand his question. I've used Gnome Shell the last months, now with 12.04beta i'm running with Unity for the next weeks. They both have very similar concepts. In the end, i'll probably go with Gnome Shell, because it's very similar and not some "we'll do our own, screw the rest of the linux comunity" thing. Never got why Canonical just couldn't build on Gnome, Unity would certainly be possible to be built on the foundations of gnome 3.x..

edit: Yes, also https://extensions.gnome.org/ is pretty neat.

Re:Gnome Shell and Unity by acabal on Friday April 06, 2012 @06:03AM (#3806566)
If I'm remembering right, Shuttleworth decided to go his own way because at the time Gnome Shell looked radically different than it does now, and he didn't forsee it--or the political environment around it--improving enough to bother building upon. However since he made that decision and showed some Unity prototypes, the Gnome Shell design did change a lot and now it resembles Unity much more than it did back then.
Re:Gnome Shell and Unity by macco on Friday April 06, 2012 @06:38AM (#3806623)
Yeah, Canonical wanted to participate in Gnome3, but nobody listened to their complaints about Gnome3.
Re:Gnome Shell and Unity by Smotko on Friday April 06, 2012 @06:01AM (#3806562)
I agree, Canonical should have made Unity upon gnome 3.x. Those compiz patches and are really nasty.
Re:Gnome Shell and Unity by cgb on Friday April 06, 2012 @06:07AM (#3806572)
Compiz also seems to be in trouble: http://smspillaz.wordpress.com/2011/12/25/apology-2/