News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the challenges we faced. Parent comment

Re:We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the ch... by radicalriddler on Sunday October 29, 2023 @09:15PM (#38064605)
Didn't they only need the 700MB dockerfile due to Fly.io requiring it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the ch... by benwaffle on Sunday October 29, 2023 @10:31PM (#38065074)
Fly.io supports up to 8GB docker images
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the ch... by radicalriddler on Sunday October 29, 2023 @10:59PM (#38065223)
Cool. By the sounds of it, they needed the docker image in the first place because they chose fly.io. This guy is saying that Cloudflare wouldn't support it, but if they went the cloudflare route (which I'm not saying whether or not it's actually possible), they wouldn't have needed the docker image in the first place.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We migrated our back end from Vercel to Fly.io and the ch... by NicoJuicy on Monday October 30, 2023 @02:53AM (#38066428)
Correct. Which was actually already in my tldr

> TLDR: They could have done it cheaper, quicker and without adding DevOps to their workload with just migrating to Cloudflare.

See: quicker= less changes required to migrate...

[ Parent | on HN ]