News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung disables customer phones remotely, holds data hos... by AnthonyMouse on Saturday October 28, 2023 @01:35PM (#38051790)
> Taking the time to install a custom ROM, run only FOSS apps, or find workarounds for needed apps, etc only to spend 90% of your time watching YouTube just doesn’t seem like a gain.

Think of it as reserving the right. Rights not exercised are lost. Retaining the ability to do something is valuable whether you need it right now or not. You may need it later.

Re:Samsung disables customer phones remotely, holds data hos... by Belopolye on Saturday October 28, 2023 @01:43PM (#38051876)
That’s something I haven’t considered, although for me I would choose the route of forgoing a smart phone altogether if the ability to exercise that right was lost.
Re:Samsung disables customer phones remotely, holds data hos... by AnthonyMouse on Saturday October 28, 2023 @02:05PM (#38052028)
Why would that be less inconvenient than having a smartphone with open source software on it?
Re:Samsung disables customer phones remotely, holds data hos... by Belopolye on Saturday October 28, 2023 @02:24PM (#38052174)
For my purposes there’s nothing that I can do on a FOSS smartphone that I can’t do more comfortably on my FOSS desktop.

Portability and the capacity to take pictures aside, but I also don’t go anywhere and my wife takes plenty of pictures of our kids anyway (backed up to my self-hosted NextCloud :^) ).