Re:Shadow: New browser engine made almost entirely in JavaSc...
by armchairhacker on Friday October 27, 2023 @07:36PM
(#38045343)
> I don't know how we got from "don't download and install random software from untrusted sources on your devices" to "let anyone with a website run code directly on your hardware. Sandboxes are impossible to breech!"
The whole point of WASM is that it's the alternative to downloading and installing random software.
Re:Shadow: New browser engine made almost entirely in JavaSc...
by nehal3m on Friday October 27, 2023 @07:40PM
(#38045372)
Wasn’t that your parents point though?
Re:Shadow: New browser engine made almost entirely in JavaSc...
by autoexec on Friday October 27, 2023 @07:43PM
(#38045395)
"Same malware, but with fewer steps" isn't exactly a win for WASM.
Re:Shadow: New browser engine made almost entirely in JavaSc...
by minitech on Friday October 27, 2023 @10:24PM
(#38046510)
It has exactly the same potential in the control and code-running respects as (minified) JavaScript. It’s overrepresented in malware because it’s faster, i.e. better for cryptominers. (Many sandbox breaches come from JavaScript’s complexity.)
Re:Shadow: New browser engine made almost entirely in JavaSc...
by pests on Saturday October 28, 2023 @12:29AM
(#38047145)
Right, did everyone forget about ASM.js? We already had conpile-to-js, it was just a horrible subset of more efficient JS. WASM is just the extension and further development of that.
I don't know how we got from "don't download and install random software from untrusted sources on your devices" to "let anyone with a website run code directly on your hardware. Sandboxes are impossible to breach!"
I get that it's cool tech and the promise of writing software to run on many different platforms is exciting, but from a real world/user perspective it's insane.