News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robotaxis 'do not belong in the city of Los Angeles,' law... by rob74 on Friday October 27, 2023 @09:33AM (#38038228)
That sounds a bit short-sighted TBH. I am all for protecting "licensed" taxis from Uber et al, but the (long-shot) goal of robotaxis is providing a level of service that can't be provided with human drivers because it would be too expensive. If using robotaxis becomes cheaper than owning a car, that would get rid of most of the cars parked 95% of the time that are clogging up streets all over the world.
Re:Robotaxis 'do not belong in the city of Los Angeles,' law... by SkyLemon on Friday October 27, 2023 @09:39AM (#38038283)
Long term planning in politics is often only as far as the next election.
Re:Robotaxis 'do not belong in the city of Los Angeles,' law... by dv_dt on Friday October 27, 2023 @09:49AM (#38038390)
It’s not clear to me that reliable autonomous driving wouldn’t instead clog up the streets with continuously roving robot taxis or parked autonomous vehicles that came from an even longer commute distance (because it’s easy to work or sleep during the robot drives).