And now you're making the fallacy of differentiating by the German-Austrian border and not the Danube.

Source: Am Bavarian, we're officially nearly a fourth of Germany and the Austrians talk like we do ;)

More seriously, I couldn't tell you if anything about tenses is written (and differently) in Austrian school books, or if it's just the dialect creeping up.

What I can tell you that your example sounds kinda made up, although of course I know it's proper German.

Yes, Austro-Bavarian is one language group. That being said, I was talking about formalized language standards, not spoken language.

It's called BCMS, Bosnian Croatian, Macedonian Serbian. Ili da ti prevedem Bosanski, Hrvatski, Makedonski I Sr..

Sorry, but I prefer to stay with the Yugoslav term - adding more and more letters is just another expression of petty nationalism.

Also, the M in BCMS is Montenegrin, the latest made-up language, not Macedonian (which is separate). Seems like not even the defenders of linguistic seperatism can keep up with the insanity ;-)

I wrote BCMS in my original post because it saves me the most trouble. If I say "Serbo-Croatian", a lot of people bristle at that. As a foreigner, I can't say "naški". And if I name the specific variety that I learned years ago when I had to buy a textbook, people might accuse me of having political sympathies with that country. (I get a lot of grief from people about this when I am in the region: "as a foreigner, why did you choose to speak with vocabulary typical of that country and not our country?").

I understand where you're coming from. I'd love if we could just call it the Yugoslav Language, or Yugoslavian, but that might just be me :-)

You're trying and that is respectable. People that do "govore po našem" or speak ours can and do often push their version most suited for their aims. Notice there is no "nas" or us in that version.