Re:I2P: End-to-End encrypted and anonymous Internet
by imglorp on Thursday October 26, 2023 @11:00PM
(#38034224)
Microsoft buying Skype must have added additional incentives to centralize. Regulatory, organizational control, auditing, etc. And tinfoil take would include surveiling.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I2P: End-to-End encrypted and anonymous Internet
by timschmidt on Thursday October 26, 2023 @11:24PM
(#38034373)
Re:I2P: End-to-End encrypted and anonymous Internet
by j45 on Friday October 27, 2023 @08:21AM
(#38037513)
Skype was P2P pre-acquisition.
Microsoft’s acquisition changed Skype to centralize it through their servers (and introduce all sorts of call quality issues).
It’s less about focusing on tinfoil and more about how creating $ for cloud usage, which allowed for centralization and surveillance.
Skype has been enough of a turn off from the performance issues it has / had hat many people moved elsewhere.
Re:I2P: End-to-End encrypted and anonymous Internet
by DennisP on Friday October 27, 2023 @09:29AM
(#38038182)
In the early 2000s there was a lot of discussion about a US law that required phone providers to provide for wiretapping, with no mention of the underlying tech. Being P2P, that wouldn't work for Skype, so a journalist asked the Skype CEO whether they would comply with the law and he said "We're not US company. Why would we?"
So I don't think it's all that tinfoily to think that once Skype became a US company, the government might have pressured them into making wiretaps possible, since there was a specific law that arguably required it. Considering all that Snowden revealed later, I'm not sure I'd put any digital surveillance in the tinfoil category.