Some lint tools are better than others about it. Potential is not enough - there needs to be a clear fix that shuts up the warning and makes the code function as intended (which may be different than as I wrote it!). The tool I'm thinking of didn't have that, so we regularly silenced warnings, and then a few years of that and the habit became to not even bother looking at what the warning was, just silence it.
If there is a clear fix that makes the code objectively better then I'm for the tool. However if it warns about correct code because of a potential issue that doesn't even apply that is a false positive.
The potential for an issue may be legitimate, but that doesn't make it a false positive.