Re:Adding Crushed Rock to Farmland Pulls Carbon Out of the Air
by bagels on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @05:21PM
(#38018559)
Hard to follow all the units, but, just for grinding, using these numbers:
grinding: ~14 kWh/tonne olivine
absorption: 1.25 tonne of CO2 per tonne of olivine
emissions: 0.855 lbs CO2 / kWh
emissions: 5.4 kg CO2 per 1.25 tonne CO2 (1250 kg) absorbed
Re:Adding Crushed Rock to Farmland Pulls Carbon Out of the Air
by pfdietz on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @10:27PM
(#38020979)
> emissions: 0.855 lbs CO2 / kWh
Why do there have to be CO2 emissions?
Re:Adding Crushed Rock to Farmland Pulls Carbon Out of the Air
by oldbbsnickname on Thursday October 26, 2023 @01:24AM
(#38021912)
There don't. The problem is a lack of remote industrial equipment that are EVs powered by renewable electricity sources rather than diesel fuel.
Re:Adding Crushed Rock to Farmland Pulls Carbon Out of the Air
by defrost on Thursday October 26, 2023 @01:36AM
(#38022004)
That's not really that much of a problem to be honest.
If this is to be an industrial mining scale operation that goes in with a 600 million tonne per annum target (similar scale to iron ore for steel mining operations) then the company building out the capital assets will setup EV's and solar on the grounds of both economy and PR.
You can see this with Rio Tinto Iron, Fortescue Metals, etc.
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=74&t=11