Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by watwut on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @03:15AM
(#38010105)
Living in city with frequent stops, the stops do not slow them down so much. IF you add "looking for a parking place" into estimation for a car, going by bus is frequently faster (which is why I frequently pick bus - it is more predictable and faster).
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by fshbbdssbbgdd on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @07:36PM
(#38019757)
No need to look for parking when you call the robotaxi.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by watwut on Thursday October 26, 2023 @04:22AM
(#38023106)
Then of course you wait for robotaxi.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by pbmonster on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @07:09AM
(#38011531)
> The problem is for the bus to stop near you, it has to stop often. To stop often, it has to move slowly, which means it will take forever to get to your destination.
Add bus lanes and smart traffic lights (giving busses permanent green waves), this stops being the case. Busses should never be stuck in traffic. That's bad for scheduling and makes them needlessly unattractive.
I’m a fan of public transit and have experienced many good public transit systems. The unfortunate truth is that in any neighborhood with less-than-extreme population density, you have to shape your life around the system by living and working near core transit lines to get reasonable travel times. That works great for people who can do that (I’ve done it myself!), but a better system could aim higher to serve the entire public. The American built environment simply can’t be adequately served by traditional bus networks.