News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When is privacy button not a privacy button? When Google ... by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @02:17PM (#38003071)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1621

> willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true

Intent (“willfully”) matters.

If you believe the statement is true when you say it, it isn’t perjury. It’s just incorrect.

Re:When is privacy button not a privacy button? When Google ... by pdonis on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @06:46PM (#38006738)
> If you believe the statement is true when you say it, it isn’t perjury. It’s just incorrect.

Yes, but whether you believed the statement was true when you said is not just a matter of your saying so. Other evidence can be brought to bear on the question: for example, as I have said elsewhere in this discussion, asking you how you came to believe that what you said was true, and you either admitting that you just made it up or had no good reason to believe it, or giving obviously false or evasive answers, or answers that are rebutted by other evidence (for example, you say you were told it by someone who denies that they did so). That could lead a jury in a perjury trial to conclude that in fact you were wilfully lying, even though you deny it.

Re:When is privacy button not a privacy button? When Google ... by dragonwriter on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @06:50PM (#38006768)
Yes, but when given evidence from which they might draw other conclusions, a trier of fact may not be inclined to heavily favor your testimony about your state of mind when you gave your false but maybe-or-maybe-not willfully false testimony.