Re:NASA wants the Voyagers to age gracefully, so it's time f...
by Tabular-Iceberg on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @05:18AM
(#37996584)
Good point, it’s a bit like calling hitting a baseball with a bat an “electric assist”. It’s not wrong, it’s just not very helpful.
It’s also a good illustration of why we call some forces strong and others weak.
Re:NASA wants the Voyagers to age gracefully, so it's time f...
by baseballdork on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @07:05AM
(#37997311)
> gravity assist doesn't fundamentally rely on gravity
I'm not sure how you can make that claim. If you were to bounce off the surface, that would likely not be considered a "gravity assist", no?
Re:NASA wants the Voyagers to age gracefully, so it's time f...
by dctoedt on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @07:53AM
(#37997813)
> If we could somehow "bounce" a spacecraft off a planet's surface, it would impart momentum similar to that of a gravity assist.
When my kids were little, I showed them by holding a basketball in one hand and a tennis ball in the other, with the tennis ball on top of and touching the basketball. When I dropped them simultaneously, they fell together and bounced off the driveway — and the tennis ball took off like a rocket (no pun intended).
You are correct in that the Voyagers' launch window was unique.
Nit pick: gravity assist doesn't fundamentally rely on gravity. It extracts energy from planets' motion about the sun [1]. If we could somehow "bounce" a spacecraft off a planet's surface, it would impart momentum similar to that of a gravity assist. (In my opinion, it's a badly-named term.)
[1] https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/primer...