Re:Google faces antitrust probe in Japan for pushing search ...
by akira2501 on Monday October 23, 2023 @04:17PM
(#37990979)
> but actually analyzing every possible market share increasing action doesnt seem worth it
That's sort of fundamental to how markets work. If you're not willing to do this, the government should not be willing to grant you license to operate.
> incomparison to just fighting the regulator later
Yea, don't worry about morality if it gets in the way of money. Laws don't apply if you have enough cash. The long term outcomes of allowing this to continue, I'm sure, will be great for everyone involved.
Re:Google faces antitrust probe in Japan for pushing search ...
by nathias on Monday October 23, 2023 @04:22PM
(#37991037)
you are right, there should be prison punishments for the managerial class, otherwise its just an added cost of business
Re:Google faces antitrust probe in Japan for pushing search ...
by justinclift on Monday October 23, 2023 @05:11PM
(#37991643)
"Bob, we need you to take the fall for us and go to prison for 10 years. We'll look after your family meanwhile, and pay you handsomely for your time."
Plenty of other organisations (of various sorts) are ok with that. Theres no reason Google and similar wouldn't figure out something along the same lines.
Re:Google faces antitrust probe in Japan for pushing search ...
by hyeonwho22 on Monday October 23, 2023 @05:35PM
(#37991898)
Under the Sherman Act, the criminal penalty for conspiracy to monopolize is up to 10 years in prison or $10M for individuals, and up to $100M for a business, OR up to twice the monetary benefits to conspirators OR up to twice the money lost by victims, if those amounts are over $100M.
I dont see any reason to ever have antitrust related legal counsel in advance
I get the idea of not doing anticompetitive things and hoping the market chooses you, but actually analyzing every possible market share increasing action doesnt seem worth it incomparison to just fighting the regulator later