Why children of married parents do better, but America is moving the other way

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by soeptical on Sunday October 22, 2023 @03:56PM (#37978522)

Widows/ers may have some associated confounding factors

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by hdjjhhvvhga on Sunday October 22, 2023 @04:39PM (#37978886)

I'm sorry to be off-topic but widows/ers just hurts my eyes. Why not use a more elegant alternative, widow(er)s? Even the uglier widow(s|ers) would be better.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by kirubakaran on Sunday October 22, 2023 @08:30PM (#37980311)

Or the gender neutral, invariant noun: “widowen”

BTW, shouldn’t “widower” be the person who died and the survivor be called “widowee”?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by Retric on Sunday October 22, 2023 @09:18PM (#37980553)

That may seem reasonable but widower is a man whose spouse died. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/widower

“Etymology Middle English widewer, alteration of wedow widow, widower, from Old English wuduwa widower; akin to Old English wuduwe widow”

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by hdjjhhvvhga on Monday October 23, 2023 @08:00AM (#37984462)

> Old English wuduwa

It's one of these more universal words of Indo-European origin: https://ids.clld.org/parameters/2-770#2/14.4/149.7

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why children of married parents do better, but America is... by RulerOf on Monday October 23, 2023 @12:03AM (#37981492)

I'm sure there's a style guide out there that would suggest using "The widowed."

[ Parent | on HN ]