News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by helsinkiandrew on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:12AM (#37954266)
The previous article that is linked to in the text is worth a read to:

https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/12/excel_anesthetist_rec...

"ANRO decided to honor the 10 job offers it had made by mistake and used Oriel to tell the candidates. Unfortunately, a system error in Oriel meant it then erroneously sent that communication to an additional 16 candidates. ANRO decided to honor these 16 additional offers too, and find the candidates posts."

Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by bbarnett on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:25AM (#37954354)
But that's insane! These candidates hold people's lives in their hands, and they just hured unqualified candidates!
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by DaiPlusPlus on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:42AM (#37954446)
> and they just hired unqualified candidates!

They're still people with valid medical licenses - the pool of candidates wouldn't have people who couldn't legally practice medicine, so I'd assume the qualification criteria they were being assessed on is unrelated to their ability to not accidentally kill me on the OR table.

Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by helsinkiandrew on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:42AM (#37954448)
> and they just hured unqualified candidates

Hopefully not unqualified, just not the "best" available

Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by orwin on Friday October 20, 2023 @07:21AM (#37954695)
As defined by the interview process.
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by smegsicle on Friday October 20, 2023 @01:51PM (#37959305)
they became qualified by an undocumented component of the interview process
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by KeplerBoy on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:42AM (#37954445)
What makes you think they are unqualified?

People get rejected because they are not the best fit, not because they are unfit.

Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by codeulike on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:44AM (#37954454)
I know what you mean. But reading again the recruitment process was for "third-level specialist training position (ST3)" which I think is the 3rd year of a 5 year training. So everyone was in training, its just that the relative ranking got messed up. Its not like random people could apply. So I guess thats why they decided to honor their (frankly terrible) job offer fuck ups.
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by viraptor on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:46AM (#37954468)
> unqualified candidates

While this may be true, (but someone has to be the lowest scoring one - it could've been a group where everyone is great) keep in mind it was a list of candidates who are aware of their lowest scores, getting a training position in a place aware of their lowest scores, with 5 more years ahead of them. It sucks that it happened, but I think they'll be under extreme scrutiny/pressure now.

Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by andrewaylett on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:50AM (#37954494)
Not necessarily -- perhaps they'd found 26 suitable candidates, picked ten of them to fill their ten open positions, but accidentally sent offers to all 26.
Re:Royal College considers no confidence move after Excel re... by xboxnolifes on Friday October 20, 2023 @06:58AM (#37954543)
When 500 people apply for a job with 1 open position, does that immediately make 499 of them unqualified?