Re:Tech CEO Sentenced to 5 Years in IP Address Scheme
by sgjohnson on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @03:30PM
(#37920368)
> but I can't think of a technical reason we couldn't do NAT with IPv6?
We absolutely can do NAT with IPv6, but there's no reason why anyone should (aside from stateless NAT66 in case you get a dynamic prefix that changes every now and then, but that's about the only use case)
We absolutely can do NAT with IPv6, but there's no reason why anyone should (aside from stateless NAT66 in case you get a dynamic prefix that changes every now and then, but that's about the only use case)