Re:Tech CEO Sentenced to 5 Years in IP Address Scheme
by hinkley on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @02:52PM
(#37919808)
I think 1 IP address per human was short sighted. We ran out before the human population doubled. But I think a billion per human was someone liking powers of two, and nothing more. “Ipv5” with 48 bit addressing would have done pretty well. As 6 octets or 4 base 12. For humans you could reserve all values <=512 and >256 and have about 50k times as many addresses while people sort themselves out and still be able to see at a glance that they were ipv5 addresses.
1047.258.300.0/24
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tech CEO Sentenced to 5 Years in IP Address Scheme
by scythe on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @04:57PM
(#37921463)
v4 was 32-bit, v6 was 128-bit. I think that 64 bits is a more obvious happy medium.
Conveniently, 2^13 = 8192 allows you to use most of the information available in four decimal digits. And 64 = 13•5 - 1 means that you get a roughly even division into five address tiers (with either the first or last one half the size). 4095.8191.8191.8191.8191 is a bit worse than 255.255.255.255 but not nearly as bad as ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff.