Interviews in the Age of AI: Ditch Leetcode – Try Code Reviews Instead

Re:Interviews in the Age of AI: Ditch Leetcode – Try Code Re... by Apocryphon on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @11:23AM (#37916588)

But it still feels wrong if progression is measured by an arbitrary measure orthogonal to what one actually does in one's career, no?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Interviews in the Age of AI: Ditch Leetcode – Try Code Re... by Jensson on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @11:59AM (#37917121)

Leetcode isn't progression, it is changing to a better track. Progress on that track doesn't require leetcode, just entering it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Interviews in the Age of AI: Ditch Leetcode – Try Code Re... by Apocryphon on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @12:31PM (#37917641)

In the context of this conversation we are discussing Leetcode as the status quo primary means of passing interviews for new, higher-paying jobs at FAANG-equivalent companies, as career advancement.

[ Parent | on HN ]