Re:Ask HN: Why are current LLMs not considered AGI?
by ilaksh on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @08:22AM
(#37913860)
LLMs are not the end of AI research. See LMM (large multimodal model), cognitive architecture, spiking neural networks, I-JEPA, etc. There are going to be multiple totally different types of AI that may be called be AGI, depending on who you ask.
For emotions, see Pei Wang's research.
Re:Ask HN: Why are current LLMs not considered AGI?
by latexr on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @10:26AM
(#37915625)
> That makes perfect sense.
On the contrary, it has multiple glaring flaws. When you consider that you can ask an LLM one question and get a nonsensical answer, saying that stopping them from forgetting will bring them closer to “universally-accepted” AGI has no basis in reality. Humans can’t even universally agree that the Earth is not flat, it is a pipe dream to think LLMs will bring any consensus in a few months.
Another posts points out other issues with the answer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37915367
I wonder if all these additional capabilities can be bolted onto existing LLMs or need another iteration to the transformer architecture plus retraining.