Re:Secret History of OpenStack, the Free Cloud Software That...
by ridruejo on Monday April 02, 2012 @05:36PM
(#3790211)
There are room for other solutions, my point is that they are going to be marginal at best if the only differentiation factor is that they support more standards.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Secret History of OpenStack, the Free Cloud Software That...
by wmf on Monday April 02, 2012 @06:03PM
(#3790314)
I didn't really explain myself well. The standards I mentioned have features that EC2 doesn't have, and those features make apps cheaper, more reliable, and easier to develop. Also, standards compliance makes it easier to migrate between cloud and non-cloud. It's not just because.
Re:Secret History of OpenStack, the Free Cloud Software That...
by ridruejo on Tuesday April 03, 2012 @02:07AM
(#3791711)
I am not sure the standards mentioned help make the apps more reliable, cheaper, easier to develop, at least in the traditional "higher level of the stack". Most people associate offerings like Heroku to those qualities (and they build on top of EC2). But even assuming that is the case, once the ecosystem is built around a standard platform (Windows in the 90s in my example) then no amount of technical features can effectively compete with it. You need a different approach. Microsoft in the Desktop was not beaten by a better Linux Desktop, but it will be by a combination of Google apps, the iPad, etc.