Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by thriftwy on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:11PM
(#37863841)
That would be awful. No more neuro covers? No more Hitler singing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by dvngnt_ on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:15PM
(#37863872)
The rights would apply throughout a person’s lifetime and, for their estate, 70 years after their death.
The bill includes an exception for using digital duplicates for parodies, satire, and criticism
Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by pixl97 on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:33PM
(#37864002)
Every day draws us closer to The Right to Read world.
If someone is copying and selling your work as created by you, that is one thing. Sounding like you, well guess what, your voice isn't copyrightable, and really in I see no world in which we'd want that.
Moreso, this is going to end up in lawsuits like we saw in the open source world in the 2000s in the SCO vs Linux debacle. "That voice sounds kinda like me, so it must have been trained on my data!"
Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by sbassi on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:33PM
(#37864004)
Hitler's heir won't sue anybody, they didn't do it even when copyright for them was current.
Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by thriftwy on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:37PM
(#37864045)
But what if I want band A to cover song B for me? Trivial to do with neural networks.
Re:No Fakes Act wants to protect actors and singers from una...
by nickthegreek on Thursday October 12, 2023 @09:09PM
(#37865285)
I want this so bad. Take my playlist and jumble up the artists and songs.