News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by hnreport on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @02:36PM (#37848495)
Is there any company even remotely close to competing with Starlink in the "global satellite ISP" space?

No, or anything similar with SpaceX and Tesla

But alas, I’m accused of being a Musk dick rider.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by meepmorp on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @02:40PM (#37848536)
> But alas, I’m accused of being a Musk dick rider.

The fact that you feel compelled to add this unbidden disclaimer says more than the disclaimer itself.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by dzhiurgis on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @02:58PM (#37848779)
Rivian, Lucid and Mercedes if you want to pay 3x for somewhat better build but somewhat worse software.

I agree tho long term at lower end there’s just no way anyone can compete (except in cars of anti-software or anti-feature).

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by FireBeyond on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @04:18PM (#37849748)
> for somewhat better build

Somewhat? The build quality of a Tesla, even a Model S, resembles that of a Corolla at best. The dash creaks, there's unexplained rattles, the wind howls if things aren't sealed properly, and if you try to address anything with a Service Center you often get told 1) they can't find it, or 2) they found it, but it's "within spec".

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by dzhiurgis on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @09:04PM (#37852320)
I'm more of referring to materials, although later generation (Y and 3) seem to be using softer plastics tho some rattles are still there. I haven't driven Corolla for a while, but compared to decade old Mazda - only real leather is what I miss, else it's like every car 3 decades before.

Ultimately you have your choice tho.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by Moldoteck on Thursday October 12, 2023 @08:18AM (#37856164)
some ppl say teslas built in germany have better quality compared to us ones