Re:Before psychedelic therapy for wartime trauma, there was ...
by ipnon on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @12:26PM
(#37834226)
LLMs are great at producing “free undergrads.” By that I mean it’s now easy to train a model that can produce textbook answers to textbook questions, that is well-defined solutions to well-defined problems. Modern LLMs will not be able to replace or augment physicians much because so much of medicine comes down to understanding the patient’s context.
Re:Before psychedelic therapy for wartime trauma, there was ...
by ljlolel on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @01:07PM
(#37834684)
LLMs understand context pretty well, that's their magic, and one thing i've noticed is that they are much more thorough than a person: they won't forget the context in the next moment or the next month. A human doctor can do better but they have to really care a lot to do better. Also, they'll only be able to do some things without attending to all necessary tasks (for example one usually overlooked is communicating with caring words).
Re:Before psychedelic therapy for wartime trauma, there was ...
by j16sdiz on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @12:57AM
(#37841037)
> they won't forget the context in the next moment or the next month.
GPT-4 have a context window of 32K tokens.
> (for example one usually overlooked is communicating with caring words)
If you meant keep saying "Sorry" like GPT-4 do. No, thanks, that's not caring.
In terms of training corpus, I wonder how that is managed? Training LLMs on out-of-date scientific papers doesn't seem like a good idea. It might make sense to exclude primary research reports entirely and instead stick with current reviews and textbooks?