Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by dboreham on Monday October 09, 2023 @04:44PM
(#37825259)
There were auto-crossover RS-232 boxes going back deep into the 1980s.
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by sitzkrieg on Monday October 09, 2023 @06:15PM
(#37826134)
with baud rate detection to boot (down the line)
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by userbinator on Monday October 09, 2023 @10:57PM
(#37828062)
You can't do "auto crossover" with USB because it needs to distinguish between D+/D- for speed selection.
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/73295/in-a-u...
It works for Ethernet because the transmit and receive lanes are separate, but with USB, there's only one pair used for both directions.
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by ilyt on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @01:21PM
(#37834845)
It doesn't need to.
It chose to. They could just use different way to do it. Like, I dunno, a single packet of negotiation in slow mode...
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by crote on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:02AM
(#37829900)
Not really relevant.
Ethernet needs crossover because it has dedicated transmit/receive pairs, but USB 1.x/2.0 uses a single wire pair for both tx & rx. Ethernet crossover is pretty much identical to serial null modem cables, and those were around for a few decades by then.
USB "crossover" of the single differential wire pair would be an inversion of 0 and 1. Pretty trivial to do once you figure out a way to communicate crossover or not.
Mdi-x/auto crossover for ethernet was introduced in 1999, that is after USB (1996) was designed, not sure of the technique was known at that time