Re:Tiny Language Models Come of Age
by whimsicalism on Sunday October 08, 2023 @12:57PM
(#37812227)
60% is not vastly smaller in the way that I meant - we are talking about differences of three orders of magnitude in this article and that is what I am skeptical of.
Nevertheless, I have not actually seen a model exhibiting high-level LM capabilities (of the GPT-4 level) that was distilled.
Just because a model can match in perplexity with fewer parameters is not the same as matching the performance as subjectively measured by humanity interacting with the model.
Early days, yet. If we could cut the size by 60% every few years, we'd be looking at a situation akin to Moore's law where a performant AI might fit in my grandkid's pocket.
Re:Tiny Language Models Come of Age
by fnordpiglet on Sunday October 08, 2023 @12:59PM
(#37812243)
That doesn’t mean that a much larger with high quality training data and new training techniques won’t be more powerful than a smaller model. We have incredible efficiencies in modern computers in addition to immense resources. They both are needed for the best performance. I suspect it’s the same for LLM. Superior data, superior techniques, and superior scale will yield superior models.
So in this way you've already lost your bet, as we already know that it's possible to create vastly smaller models with similar performance.