News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Emacs and shellcheck by softirq on Friday October 06, 2023 @09:53PM (#37798368)
What's so hard about adding 5 lines to a config file? You're adding 100s of customizations that slow down emacs when you probably use a handful of them at most.
Re:Emacs and shellcheck by tra3 on Friday October 06, 2023 @11:29PM (#37798796)
Sometimes packages don’t come with sane defaults. Or something conflicts somewhere. Im tempted to plunder doom config, but I suspect it’s not straight forward.
Re:Emacs and shellcheck by dingnuts on Friday October 06, 2023 @11:58PM (#37798894)
It's not bad actually, I have plundered a number of things from Doom
Re:Emacs and shellcheck by rgoulter on Saturday October 07, 2023 @12:27AM (#37799020)
> You're adding 100s of customizations that slow down emacs

Doom Emacs' config loads faster than my hand-rolled one did.

So in that sense, with Doom I get a smaller config to maintain, for something that loads faster, while still having a rich/coherent set of features for the stuff I do bump into.

Re:Emacs and shellcheck by TeMPOraL on Saturday October 07, 2023 @04:59AM (#37800186)
> Doom Emacs' config loads faster than my hand-rolled one did.

Having browsed the Doom config sources the other day, they put a lot of effort to minimize startup time; there are various trick there that tune Emacs itself to start faster, and can be copied over to one's own vanilla config :).