News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Image Golf.

Re:Image Golf by mdrzn on Friday October 06, 2023 @06:51AM (#37789081)
Interesting concept, got a 72% in my second try. Would love to know how you calculate that
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Image Golf by d-lisp on Friday October 06, 2023 @08:55AM (#37790156)
The process is weird because the website shows the percent bar oscillating back and forth before attributing you a score, if this isn't just an animation. I am curious to know if comparing pixels and their color, the amount of pixels that are this or that hue, is sufficient to give such a result.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Image Golf by d-lisp on Friday October 06, 2023 @09:00AM (#37790204)
Okay, that's an animation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Image Golf by amanmathur on Friday October 06, 2023 @10:39AM (#37791406)
just an animation haha
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Image Golf by d-lisp on Friday October 06, 2023 @09:03AM (#37790229)
Comparing the prompt is an idea, also
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Image Golf by kitchen_sink on Friday October 06, 2023 @09:47AM (#37790744)
Pixel wise lose (MSE/PSNR) is one option, though most also use Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) as it’s more robust.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_signal-to-noise_ratio

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_similarity

[ Parent | on HN ]