If you ignore the hardest part of the problem; getting everyone to agree and coordinate, then yes it’s a simple problem to solve! You can simplify any problem like this, just ignore the hard part!
:D
This honestly sounds like something that should be doable by the university.
Also, just practically, the journals help a lot in assessing candidates. Even in fields just adjacent to mine, I might trust an endorsement by a good journal over my own judgments. Often I know the work of the editors there and value their judgment. Chasing after highest impact factor journal publications has its problems, but I haven't seen better proposals.
To bring this back to HN topics, anyone have tips on trying to suss out that trait in hiring managers during interviews?
Bigwigs at universities care about rankings, even if they are basically garbage.