Do you have any actual data suggest your doubt is founded?

The original reply stated “reported injuries could be bruised thumbs”

This supports the idea that not just reported injuries were high but so were injuries which required ambulance calls.

If you have data to suggest those were all for bruised thumbs you should add that yourself.

My mistake, I misread your doubtful reply up a level such that you were doubting the safety office's report, not quoting it to the "bruised thumbs" reply. Cheers.

Oh gotcha, no worries.