Re:How Washington DC Got Its Metro
by crooked-v on Thursday September 28, 2023 @02:30AM
(#37686042)
For this case I would assume it's the security concerns that go with a publicly-accessible subway line directly under the building.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Washington DC Got Its Metro
by bobthepanda on Thursday September 28, 2023 @02:55AM
(#37686241)
This was in the ‘60s when there were significantly less security issues.
There’s still a fairly large train station complex underneath the World Trade Center.
Re:How Washington DC Got Its Metro
by mixmastamyk on Thursday September 28, 2023 @03:06AM
(#37686318)
Probably not in 1960—Russian nukes would come from the sky. Also the Capitol already has a few tunnels underground.
Cities like London and Madrid actually have had bombs on trains. It's not a "security threat" to buildings above.
What is a security threat to infrastructure are roads, where you can drive massive vehicles into people, transport and explode bombs, etc. The Manchester bombing for example was a truck exploding parked on a public road.
Re:How Washington DC Got Its Metro
by cowsandmilk on Thursday September 28, 2023 @03:50AM
(#37686591)
If it was security, those concerns certainly weren’t shared at the Pentagon where the Metro entrance and exit were into the building for decades.