Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On...
by lostmsu on Thursday September 28, 2023 @10:16AM
(#37689919)
I feel like that would kill Google.
Re:Judge Rules US v. Google Trial Documents Can Be Posted On...
by ahahahahah on Thursday September 28, 2023 @10:42PM
(#37698697)
What if you searched "best canon camera 2023" and clicked the top (shitty probably ai generated) result https://www.bestcanoncamera2023.com? Do you think you would want to go back to that great site when you continued your research the next day?
I could see there being a lot of queries where the search is the preferred thing to repeat.
To put a finer (more-explicit) point on that: That sounds like an attempt to keep people making google searches over and over merely to return to whatever search-result they already found in the past and wanted to see again.
It's true that not everything in the browser-history is what people want, but still... Imagine I searched for "monkey island ferry schedule" and picked the obviously-correct first result at "dot.monkey.gov/ferries". Boom, done, got it. Then if I want that information again tomorrow, why would I ever want to re-search, as opposed to just returning to the same result?
In contrast to all this Chrome stuff, let's imagine a browser that is utterly focused on the user's best-interests. With sufficient features/intelligence, it would actually do the exact opposite: "I notice every time you search any monkey/ferry stuff, you always stop once you get to that same result... So you probably always want exactly that page, therefore I should offer it prominently to help you avoid wasting time on unnecessary searches."